I have provided the attached peer review. 

Misty Stone

Hello, I have made my comments on the attached documents. I highly encourage you to reorganize the paper. You seem to want to focus on the leadership styles however these are lost in the narrative, bring them forward as subheadings. Also, I am confused at how you are using Rogers' work. I have other comments throughout the paper. Lastly please put your references in APA format.

Consider adding Articles or writings from Matthew Fairholm.  His research covers authenticity in a way the lit review hasn't cover yet. Also, I'd like to see more about why women were chosen. Overall, really interesting subject-- authenticity is important to leadership.

I find this study interesting and relate to it just in a different way. Thank you for inviting others for further research to understand the problem better. This is sensitive subject and I’m sure other folks can relate to it in search of meaning, identity, and power.

As noted above in a different comment, it can be easy to get lost in the narrative and not bringing up the points of your study. My suggestion is structure your study in order to use the stories and counter-stories to make your points of the study, without losing focus. 

Thanks for the handwork on this!

The title of the article is motivating, compelling and captures the interest of the reader at first glance. See attachment for additional comments.