2016 - Volume 5 (Issue 2) Symposium Issue
2016 - Volume 5 (Issue 2) Symposium Issue
Individual articles can be accessed below. The full volume of the journal is available at the following link: |
| |
As the number of applicants to dental hygiene education programs continues to increase, the need to identify qualified applicants who will pass their board examinations and obtain licensure continues to grow. It was not known if or to what extent interviewing candidates for accredited dental hygiene programs in the admission process would result in statistically significant differences in dental hygiene student success on board examinations. The purpose of this quantitative causal-comparative research was to determine if statistically significant differences existed in student success measures between accredited dental hygiene programs within the United States that interview in the admission process and those programs that do not interview. | |
This observation was compiled as a contribution for a seminar on social responsibility as it pertains to the author’s field. It contributes to our understanding of civic responsibility in young adults by examining | |
Social responsibility in business has become an increasingly popular trend in the American economy. At the root of this social movement is seeing the value of products as more than just the utility they provide. Understanding how utility became the sole determinant of valuation gives historical insight into social arrangements that existed prior to capitalism, primarily ones that encouraged social responsibility. It becomes apparent how a disconnect formed between products and their users and producers—that | |
Economic perspectives of self-interested human behavior demonstrate that mutually beneficial outcomes can occur when self-interested parties freely engage in trade with one another. The resourceful, evaluating, maximizing (REMM) economic model describes and explains self-interested human | |
The traditional belief in the inevitability of social stratification is one of the historical antecedents perpetuating the prevalence of perceived ability grouping in today’s American classroom. Since the very foundation of the Republic, rich and poor Americans have consistently received qualitatively different educational opportunities. The quest for a more egalitarian model embodies the warp and woof of positive social change in public schools, for it goes to the heart of whether public education provides an inclusionary or exclusionary function within the American culture. There is much evidence, via a historical examination, that deeply held beliefs premised on a perception that the dueling philosophies of inclusion and exclusion both emanate from a web of deeply held, yet contradictory views of the American experience. The inclusionary view embraces a vibrant democracy, an educated citizenry and concomitant personal and societal improvement (Banks 2015). On the contrary, the exclusionary view envisions a type of intellectual meritocracy, a traditional bio-societal totem pole justified via the use of empirical data to efficiently categorize society into a layered hierarchy. | |
Promotional Social Responsibility In Online Education Through Service Learning Andrea Hogan | This paper addresses how service learning benefits students and promotes social responsibility in online education. University-promoted community outreach increases student commitment while encouraging social responsibility outside the classroom. Currently, there is a lack of research and empirical study regarding community engagement and online students. Studies on service learning in the online platform are notably scarce. This paper will address this gap and explore how incorporating service learning in online education can positively enhance the student’s learning experience while promoting social responsibility. Additionally, the author will explore why service learning is important in contemporary education. |
Page Options