What faculty and students think about online education
The popularity of online education has increased dramatically in the past decade. Most university has some form of online education. Although the reasons for instituting online programs vary, the studies relating to the perception of online education at the college level by both faculty and students have been minimal (Murdock & Williams, 2011). The Hot Chalk Education Index (2013), however, recently conducted a survey of students and faculty to ascertain their perceptions of online education as compared to traditional ground-based courses. The findings are interesting. 36 percent of faculty and 27 percent of students found there was no substantive difference between online and ground-based learning. 12 percent of instructors and 27 percent of students preferred online learning to traditional ground courses. 15 percent of faculty and 14 percent of students indicated they preferred ground-based education to online education. Although the findings of the survey may lack generalizability for reasons of scale, and the results did not indicate student or faculty demographics, the findings bring up some interesting points.
The plurality of both students and faculty indicated there were little or no differences between the two modalities of education relating to preferred modality. Given the nascent popularity of online education, the trend seems to indicate usage of online education will increase among both students and faculty. The most interesting finding of the survey might be students tended to favor online education over faculty, by nearly a two-to-one margin. Hence, crucial point from this finding can be students favor online education more than faculty.
This may be based on a perceived disconnect many faculty members hold about online education. Removing faculty from the lectern and forcing them to function in an emerging milieu unsurprisingly creates some resistance and negative feeling (Hawkins, Graham, & Barbour, 2012). The causation of this may be that current professors were educated in a traditional ground setting, in which the modality was professor-centric, and the professor had more control over the educational setting. For faculty new to the online realm, ascertaining their new position and how serve their students in this environment is a salient concern. Although some traditional teaching techniques are transferable from the ground-based classroom to the virtual classroom, others are not. My questions are: what are your best practices for operating in the online realm, what advice would you give professor use to the traditional classroom about the online realm, and how has your experience in the online classroom environment compared to a traditional ground-based setting?
Reference:
Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2012). Everybody is their own island: teacher disconnection in a virtual school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2, 124-144.
Hot Chalk Educational Index. (2013). How do people around the world use educational technology, products, and online services? Retrieved from http://www.educationinamerica.com/research/hotchalk-edu-index/
Murdock, J. L., & Williams, A. M. (2011). Creating an online learning community: Is it possible? Innovation in Higher Education, 36, 305-315. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9188-6
Page Options
4 Comments
Eric, thanks for introducing the Hot Chalk Educational Index. It was an interesting read. I also appreciate that your summary mentioned the results may lack generalizability due to scale. This was a very important addition because basically I do not think we can infer anything from Hot Chalk's results except that their readers favor online education.
As an online instructor myself, I was initially pleased to read these findings. Unfortuntely, Hot Chalk's results are skewed. This was not a random sample of students or teachers. Hot Chalk used their own constituents which they readily admit on their methodology slide when they write, "ensures a statistically valid representation of a publisher's audience" (Hot Chalk, 2013, p. 15). This is just a nice way of saying they did not use a random sample since they only surveyed their "audience". It is like a rock band asking their fans whether or not rock music is the most popular music in the world. Hot Chalk's audience is already pro-online (by the nature of their product) thus the results are statistically skewed. We should not take much, if any, stock in them.
This study is a very good reminder of the need for proper sampling techniques. Until Hot Chalk takes a random sample of ALL students/instructors (and not just those who subscribe to their site) their data is only statistically valid for one audience, namely their readers.
Scott (former Stats professor!) ^_^
Hello Scott:
Thank you for your feedback and your comments about the validity of survey results. I believe your posit is a salient reminder to everyone that many survey are inherently skewed by the population involved in the survey as well as the biases of the researcher or organization conducting the survey. Issues of skewing research data are replete in academia currently given the focus on showing statistical significance. In other words, many researchers are altering their data in order to produce desirable results. Your comments and sage advice about lack of generalizability of survey results can serve all researchers well as they search for and analyze online data.
Thanks,
Eric
Thanks Eric. I do not often get the words "sage advice" connected to my name so I appreciate the comments. Thanks again for your constant promotion of the value of online education. Some day I hope someone is able ot take a legitimate sample of the student/teacher higher education populace so that we have an accurate understanding of the how online education is being perceived.
Thanks,
Scott
You have a very good website, which is loading very fast.. can you tell us how you managed it ? smartphonesunder10000.com or best phone under 10000 in january 2016 or best phone under 15000 for india in 2016